Warning: fopen(/home/broadba5/public_html/wp-content/cache/) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Is a directory in /home/broadba5/public_html/wp-content/plugins/wp-cache/wp-cache-phase2.php on line 96
Broadband Politics » Baseball http://broadbandpolitics.com On the theory and practice of networking Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:39:17 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Baseball Forecast http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/#comments Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:41:33 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5519 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/feed/ 0 Numb3rs botches Simpson’s Paradox http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/#comments Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:56:15 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5253 really say that, but that's beside the point.) The example given was David Justice's and Derek Jeter's batting averages in 1995 and 1997. In each year, Justice had a better average than Jeter, but for the total of the two years, Jeter was alleged to have had a better average. It's not hard to figure out how this could be true, but it wasn't. The actual numbers for those years are these:
          Justice  H/AB     Jeter    H/AB
          -------           -----
1995       .253   104/411   .250     12/48
1997       .329   163/495   .291   190/654
==========================================
Comb.      .295   267/906   .288   202/702
Justice's numbers, Jeter's numbers If Jeter had hit better in 1997, much closer to Justice's average, it would have been true because Jeter very few at bats in 1995 and many more at bats in 1997 than Justice. For some bizarre reason, the show used fictitious numbers that didn't even add up, alleging that Justice hit .321 and .329 for a combined average of .298. How a show that's supposed to be so math-oriented can screw up arithmetic so badly would be a a mystery if it weren't for the fact that mathematicians are notoriously bad at basic arithmetic. H/T Amnesia, who also got it wrong. UPDATE: Aha! Reader Brian Thomas explains it all. See comments.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/feed/ 1
Congratulations, Phillies http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:24:21 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5083 had a lot to do with it, apparently, which must rankle Mr. NASCAR, Kevin Martin, whose car has crashed. [caption id="attachment_5084" align="alignnone" width="280" caption="Million Fan March"]Million Fan March[/caption]]]> http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/feed/ 0 How Sweep It Is http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/#comments Tue, 27 May 2008 10:28:20 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4426 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/feed/ 0 Player of the Week http://broadbandpolitics.com On the theory and practice of networking Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:39:17 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Broadband Politics » Baseball http://broadbandpolitics.com On the theory and practice of networking Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:39:17 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Baseball Forecast http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/#comments Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:41:33 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5519 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/feed/ 0 Numb3rs botches Simpson’s Paradox http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/#comments Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:56:15 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5253 really say that, but that's beside the point.) The example given was David Justice's and Derek Jeter's batting averages in 1995 and 1997. In each year, Justice had a better average than Jeter, but for the total of the two years, Jeter was alleged to have had a better average. It's not hard to figure out how this could be true, but it wasn't. The actual numbers for those years are these:
          Justice  H/AB     Jeter    H/AB
          -------           -----
1995       .253   104/411   .250     12/48
1997       .329   163/495   .291   190/654
==========================================
Comb.      .295   267/906   .288   202/702
Justice's numbers, Jeter's numbers If Jeter had hit better in 1997, much closer to Justice's average, it would have been true because Jeter very few at bats in 1995 and many more at bats in 1997 than Justice. For some bizarre reason, the show used fictitious numbers that didn't even add up, alleging that Justice hit .321 and .329 for a combined average of .298. How a show that's supposed to be so math-oriented can screw up arithmetic so badly would be a a mystery if it weren't for the fact that mathematicians are notoriously bad at basic arithmetic. H/T Amnesia, who also got it wrong. UPDATE: Aha! Reader Brian Thomas explains it all. See comments.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/feed/ 1
Congratulations, Phillies http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:24:21 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5083 had a lot to do with it, apparently, which must rankle Mr. NASCAR, Kevin Martin, whose car has crashed. [caption id="attachment_5084" align="alignnone" width="280" caption="Million Fan March"]Million Fan March[/caption]]]> http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/feed/ 0 How Sweep It Is http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/#comments Tue, 27 May 2008 10:28:20 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4426 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/feed/ 0 Player of the Week http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/#comments Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:41:33 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5519 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/feed/ 0 Broadband Politics » Baseball http://broadbandpolitics.com On the theory and practice of networking Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:39:17 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Baseball Forecast http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/#comments Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:41:33 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5519 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/feed/ 0 Numb3rs botches Simpson’s Paradox http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/#comments Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:56:15 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5253 really say that, but that's beside the point.) The example given was David Justice's and Derek Jeter's batting averages in 1995 and 1997. In each year, Justice had a better average than Jeter, but for the total of the two years, Jeter was alleged to have had a better average. It's not hard to figure out how this could be true, but it wasn't. The actual numbers for those years are these:
          Justice  H/AB     Jeter    H/AB
          -------           -----
1995       .253   104/411   .250     12/48
1997       .329   163/495   .291   190/654
==========================================
Comb.      .295   267/906   .288   202/702
Justice's numbers, Jeter's numbers If Jeter had hit better in 1997, much closer to Justice's average, it would have been true because Jeter very few at bats in 1995 and many more at bats in 1997 than Justice. For some bizarre reason, the show used fictitious numbers that didn't even add up, alleging that Justice hit .321 and .329 for a combined average of .298. How a show that's supposed to be so math-oriented can screw up arithmetic so badly would be a a mystery if it weren't for the fact that mathematicians are notoriously bad at basic arithmetic. H/T Amnesia, who also got it wrong. UPDATE: Aha! Reader Brian Thomas explains it all. See comments.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/feed/ 1
Congratulations, Phillies http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:24:21 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5083 had a lot to do with it, apparently, which must rankle Mr. NASCAR, Kevin Martin, whose car has crashed. [caption id="attachment_5084" align="alignnone" width="280" caption="Million Fan March"]Million Fan March[/caption]]]> http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/feed/ 0 How Sweep It Is http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/#comments Tue, 27 May 2008 10:28:20 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4426 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/feed/ 0 Player of the Week http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/#comments Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:56:15 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5253 really say that, but that's beside the point.) The example given was David Justice's and Derek Jeter's batting averages in 1995 and 1997. In each year, Justice had a better average than Jeter, but for the total of the two years, Jeter was alleged to have had a better average. It's not hard to figure out how this could be true, but it wasn't. The actual numbers for those years are these:
          Justice  H/AB     Jeter    H/AB
          -------           -----
1995       .253   104/411   .250     12/48
1997       .329   163/495   .291   190/654
==========================================
Comb.      .295   267/906   .288   202/702
Justice's numbers, Jeter's numbers If Jeter had hit better in 1997, much closer to Justice's average, it would have been true because Jeter very few at bats in 1995 and many more at bats in 1997 than Justice. For some bizarre reason, the show used fictitious numbers that didn't even add up, alleging that Justice hit .321 and .329 for a combined average of .298. How a show that's supposed to be so math-oriented can screw up arithmetic so badly would be a a mystery if it weren't for the fact that mathematicians are notoriously bad at basic arithmetic. H/T Amnesia, who also got it wrong. UPDATE: Aha! Reader Brian Thomas explains it all. See comments.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/feed/ 1
Broadband Politics » Baseball http://broadbandpolitics.com On the theory and practice of networking Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:39:17 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Baseball Forecast http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/#comments Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:41:33 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5519 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/feed/ 0 Numb3rs botches Simpson’s Paradox http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/#comments Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:56:15 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5253 really say that, but that's beside the point.) The example given was David Justice's and Derek Jeter's batting averages in 1995 and 1997. In each year, Justice had a better average than Jeter, but for the total of the two years, Jeter was alleged to have had a better average. It's not hard to figure out how this could be true, but it wasn't. The actual numbers for those years are these:
          Justice  H/AB     Jeter    H/AB
          -------           -----
1995       .253   104/411   .250     12/48
1997       .329   163/495   .291   190/654
==========================================
Comb.      .295   267/906   .288   202/702
Justice's numbers, Jeter's numbers If Jeter had hit better in 1997, much closer to Justice's average, it would have been true because Jeter very few at bats in 1995 and many more at bats in 1997 than Justice. For some bizarre reason, the show used fictitious numbers that didn't even add up, alleging that Justice hit .321 and .329 for a combined average of .298. How a show that's supposed to be so math-oriented can screw up arithmetic so badly would be a a mystery if it weren't for the fact that mathematicians are notoriously bad at basic arithmetic. H/T Amnesia, who also got it wrong. UPDATE: Aha! Reader Brian Thomas explains it all. See comments.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/feed/ 1
Congratulations, Phillies http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:24:21 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5083 had a lot to do with it, apparently, which must rankle Mr. NASCAR, Kevin Martin, whose car has crashed. [caption id="attachment_5084" align="alignnone" width="280" caption="Million Fan March"]Million Fan March[/caption]]]> http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/feed/ 0 How Sweep It Is http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/#comments Tue, 27 May 2008 10:28:20 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4426 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/feed/ 0 Player of the Week http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:24:21 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5083 had a lot to do with it, apparently, which must rankle Mr. NASCAR, Kevin Martin, whose car has crashed. [caption id="attachment_5084" align="alignnone" width="280" caption="Million Fan March"]Million Fan March[/caption]]]> http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/feed/ 0 Broadband Politics » Baseball http://broadbandpolitics.com On the theory and practice of networking Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:39:17 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Baseball Forecast http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/#comments Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:41:33 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5519 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/feed/ 0 Numb3rs botches Simpson’s Paradox http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/#comments Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:56:15 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5253 really say that, but that's beside the point.) The example given was David Justice's and Derek Jeter's batting averages in 1995 and 1997. In each year, Justice had a better average than Jeter, but for the total of the two years, Jeter was alleged to have had a better average. It's not hard to figure out how this could be true, but it wasn't. The actual numbers for those years are these:
          Justice  H/AB     Jeter    H/AB
          -------           -----
1995       .253   104/411   .250     12/48
1997       .329   163/495   .291   190/654
==========================================
Comb.      .295   267/906   .288   202/702
Justice's numbers, Jeter's numbers If Jeter had hit better in 1997, much closer to Justice's average, it would have been true because Jeter very few at bats in 1995 and many more at bats in 1997 than Justice. For some bizarre reason, the show used fictitious numbers that didn't even add up, alleging that Justice hit .321 and .329 for a combined average of .298. How a show that's supposed to be so math-oriented can screw up arithmetic so badly would be a a mystery if it weren't for the fact that mathematicians are notoriously bad at basic arithmetic. H/T Amnesia, who also got it wrong. UPDATE: Aha! Reader Brian Thomas explains it all. See comments.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/feed/ 1
Congratulations, Phillies http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:24:21 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5083 had a lot to do with it, apparently, which must rankle Mr. NASCAR, Kevin Martin, whose car has crashed. [caption id="attachment_5084" align="alignnone" width="280" caption="Million Fan March"]Million Fan March[/caption]]]> http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/feed/ 0 How Sweep It Is http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/#comments Tue, 27 May 2008 10:28:20 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4426 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/feed/ 0 Player of the Week http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/#comments Tue, 27 May 2008 10:28:20 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4426 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/feed/ 0 Broadband Politics » Baseball http://broadbandpolitics.com On the theory and practice of networking Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:39:17 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 Baseball Forecast http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/#comments Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:41:33 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5519 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/04/baseball-forecast/feed/ 0 Numb3rs botches Simpson’s Paradox http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/#comments Sun, 07 Dec 2008 04:56:15 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5253 really say that, but that's beside the point.) The example given was David Justice's and Derek Jeter's batting averages in 1995 and 1997. In each year, Justice had a better average than Jeter, but for the total of the two years, Jeter was alleged to have had a better average. It's not hard to figure out how this could be true, but it wasn't. The actual numbers for those years are these:
          Justice  H/AB     Jeter    H/AB
          -------           -----
1995       .253   104/411   .250     12/48
1997       .329   163/495   .291   190/654
==========================================
Comb.      .295   267/906   .288   202/702
Justice's numbers, Jeter's numbers If Jeter had hit better in 1997, much closer to Justice's average, it would have been true because Jeter very few at bats in 1995 and many more at bats in 1997 than Justice. For some bizarre reason, the show used fictitious numbers that didn't even add up, alleging that Justice hit .321 and .329 for a combined average of .298. How a show that's supposed to be so math-oriented can screw up arithmetic so badly would be a a mystery if it weren't for the fact that mathematicians are notoriously bad at basic arithmetic. H/T Amnesia, who also got it wrong. UPDATE: Aha! Reader Brian Thomas explains it all. See comments.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/12/numb3rs-botches-simpsons-paradox/feed/ 1
Congratulations, Phillies http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/#comments Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:24:21 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=5083 had a lot to do with it, apparently, which must rankle Mr. NASCAR, Kevin Martin, whose car has crashed. [caption id="attachment_5084" align="alignnone" width="280" caption="Million Fan March"]Million Fan March[/caption]]]> http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/11/congratulations-phillies/feed/ 0 How Sweep It Is http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/#comments Tue, 27 May 2008 10:28:20 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4426 http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/how-sweep-it-is/feed/ 0 Player of the Week http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/player-of-the-week/ http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/player-of-the-week/#comments Tue, 06 May 2008 01:36:09 +0000 Richard Bennett http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/player-of-the-week/ Jack Cust seemed to have got his groove back. A week later, Major League Baseball agrees, awarding him Player of the Week. But of course.

I got to see Cust's third homer in four games yesterday at the Coliseum, as the A's cut down the Rangers 3-1 in the final game of their series. With the Orioles in town this evening, I expect the A's winning ways to continue. They're presently one game behind the division-leading Angels, who face the Royals this week. Funnest part of the game yesterday, other than Cust's two-run blast in the seventh, was Huston Street's histrionics in the ninth inning. That boy does get excited.]]>
http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/player-of-the-week/feed/ 2