<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broadband Politics &#187; Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The interviewer&#8217;s name was Charlie</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why Palin's ignorance is &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_palin_interview.php">Palin's ignorance </a> is troubling:

<blockquote>What Sarah Palin revealed is that she has not been interested enough in world affairs to become minimally conversant with the issues. Many people in our great land might have difficulty defining the "Bush Doctrine" exactly. But not to recognize the name, as obviously was the case for Palin, indicates not a failure of last-minute cramming but a lack of attention to any foreign-policy discussion whatsoever in the last seven years.
</blockquote>

Fred Kaplan's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199937/">recap in Slate</a> is excellent:

<blockquote>
The other spine-chilling moment came when Gibson asked about her recent comment, in a speech at her church, that the war in Iraq is "a task that is from God." (ABC then showed a YouTube clip of the speech.) Palin tried to finesse the question, saying that her remarks were only "a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words" that we should pray not that God is on our side but that we are on God's side. Gibson didn't back down, noting that she had in fact gone on to say, "There is a plan, and it is God's plan." To this, Palin replied:

   <em> I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that these are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That in my worldview is a grandâ€”the grand plan.</em>

Two things came to mind upon hearing her say these words. First, they sound like the earnest answer given by a contestant in a beauty pageant when the M.C. asks her about world peace. (Sorry to seem sexist, but it's true; read it again.)

Second, and more to the point, do we want someone a heartbeat away from the presidencyâ€”and a 72-year-old cancer survivor's heartbeat, at thatâ€”to possess both impetuousness ("You can't blink") and holy certitude? Isn't that what we've had, actually in the Oval Office, the past eight years?</blockquote>

Robots are wired to react a certain way, but people are required to think. 

Here's the bonus beauty queen interview for comparison:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

In other news, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6595446.html?rssid=193">Lorne Michaels Wants Fey for SNL's Palin:</a>
<blockquote>Saturday Night Live creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels said the show is talking with Tina Fey about playing Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin at some point this season, possibly as soon as this Saturday's season premiere.</blockquote>

This would be superb, of course.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was McCain thinking?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26457563#26457563" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the big dog. She's not at all embarrassing, not a Katherine Harris, Harriet Miers, or Dan Quayle. All in all, a good contrast to Biden who's tainted with the scent of corruption. 

This just might work for McCain.

UPDATE: But seriously, what was McCain thinking? Palin is a nice woman, but there's no way in hell she should be allowed inside the White House if not on a tour. McCain has effectively conceded the election. Welcome to the Oval Office, President Obama, listen to Sen. Biden carefully and don't screw too many things up.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close to a Cult</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/close-to-a-cult/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Walker, the author of The Color Purple, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. There's an interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London) on the breakdown &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice Walker, the author of <em>The Color Purple</em>, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. <!--more-->There's an <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London)</a> on the breakdown of the relationship that's informative reading if you care for this sort of thing.
<br /></p><blockquote><p>Having been raised to believe that â€œitâ€™s not nature, itâ€™s nurtureâ€, she was not prepared for the strength of her feelings for her baby. â€œI adore him,â€ she says. â€œHeâ€™s really into running and jumping and heâ€™s very attached to me. Itâ€™s all, â€˜Mommy, Mommy, Mommyâ€™, and itâ€™s very difficult to leave him.â€<br /></p><p><br />People she meets constantly express surprise at whatâ€™s happened â€” surely having a child should have brought her closer to her mother, rather than splitting them asunder? She agrees.<br /></p><p><br />â€œPeople donâ€™t really understand how strong ideology can be,â€ she says. â€œI think sometimes of that group and that feminism as being close to a cult. I feel I had to de-programme myself in order to have independent thought. Itâ€™s been an ongoing struggle. When you have a cult, you have a cult leader who demands a certain conformity . . . And when you have a celebrity who has cultural-icon status, economic power beyond what you can imagine, you canâ€™t resist that person â€” if you want to stay in their realm. Because once you start challenging them, they kick you out.â€ <br /></p></blockquote>That's the trouble with ideological movements, they lose the ability for self-critical reflection on their efficiency in translating ideals into practice, invariably preferring the consistency of the ideals to the messiness of reality.<br />

As bad a parent as Alice Walker was, she doesn't hold a candle to Austrian engineer Josef Fritzl, of course. Don't <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/austria">click through</a> unless you're prepared to be completely revolted; this dude imprisoned his daughter in an underground dungeon for 24 years, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whaddup, bitches?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/08/07/whaddup-bitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if this law passes: The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=b5db8bf97da0d25d&ex=1344139200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">this law passes:</a>

<blockquote>
The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates â€œa paradigm of shame and indignityâ€ for all women.</blockquote>

Somebody should bitch-slap Councilwoman Mealy before she embarrasses her momma again. 

This is a fine example of slippery slopes in action. The Council banned the use of the "n-word", so why shouldn't they ban the "b-word" as nearly as offensive? And then "fatty" because it's nearly as offensive as "bitch", and then "retard", and then "dullard", and then "not exactly a genius". Why not ban all the words in the English language, on the grounds that each one can hurt somebody's feelings if used in the right context?

Then New Yorkers, who used to be the freest people in the world until they started banning smoking in bars and fast food and hard words, will just sit in their many corners banging their heads against their many walls and moaning, almost imperceptibly, about the abject emptiness of their lives.

The bitches.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No good deed goes unpunished</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Broadband Politics &#187; Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The interviewer&#8217;s name was Charlie</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why Palin's ignorance is &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_palin_interview.php">Palin's ignorance </a> is troubling:

<blockquote>What Sarah Palin revealed is that she has not been interested enough in world affairs to become minimally conversant with the issues. Many people in our great land might have difficulty defining the "Bush Doctrine" exactly. But not to recognize the name, as obviously was the case for Palin, indicates not a failure of last-minute cramming but a lack of attention to any foreign-policy discussion whatsoever in the last seven years.
</blockquote>

Fred Kaplan's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199937/">recap in Slate</a> is excellent:

<blockquote>
The other spine-chilling moment came when Gibson asked about her recent comment, in a speech at her church, that the war in Iraq is "a task that is from God." (ABC then showed a YouTube clip of the speech.) Palin tried to finesse the question, saying that her remarks were only "a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words" that we should pray not that God is on our side but that we are on God's side. Gibson didn't back down, noting that she had in fact gone on to say, "There is a plan, and it is God's plan." To this, Palin replied:

   <em> I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that these are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That in my worldview is a grandâ€”the grand plan.</em>

Two things came to mind upon hearing her say these words. First, they sound like the earnest answer given by a contestant in a beauty pageant when the M.C. asks her about world peace. (Sorry to seem sexist, but it's true; read it again.)

Second, and more to the point, do we want someone a heartbeat away from the presidencyâ€”and a 72-year-old cancer survivor's heartbeat, at thatâ€”to possess both impetuousness ("You can't blink") and holy certitude? Isn't that what we've had, actually in the Oval Office, the past eight years?</blockquote>

Robots are wired to react a certain way, but people are required to think. 

Here's the bonus beauty queen interview for comparison:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

In other news, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6595446.html?rssid=193">Lorne Michaels Wants Fey for SNL's Palin:</a>
<blockquote>Saturday Night Live creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels said the show is talking with Tina Fey about playing Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin at some point this season, possibly as soon as this Saturday's season premiere.</blockquote>

This would be superb, of course.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was McCain thinking?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26457563#26457563" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the big dog. She's not at all embarrassing, not a Katherine Harris, Harriet Miers, or Dan Quayle. All in all, a good contrast to Biden who's tainted with the scent of corruption. 

This just might work for McCain.

UPDATE: But seriously, what was McCain thinking? Palin is a nice woman, but there's no way in hell she should be allowed inside the White House if not on a tour. McCain has effectively conceded the election. Welcome to the Oval Office, President Obama, listen to Sen. Biden carefully and don't screw too many things up.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close to a Cult</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/close-to-a-cult/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Walker, the author of The Color Purple, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. There's an interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London) on the breakdown &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice Walker, the author of <em>The Color Purple</em>, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. <!--more-->There's an <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London)</a> on the breakdown of the relationship that's informative reading if you care for this sort of thing.
<br /></p><blockquote><p>Having been raised to believe that â€œitâ€™s not nature, itâ€™s nurtureâ€, she was not prepared for the strength of her feelings for her baby. â€œI adore him,â€ she says. â€œHeâ€™s really into running and jumping and heâ€™s very attached to me. Itâ€™s all, â€˜Mommy, Mommy, Mommyâ€™, and itâ€™s very difficult to leave him.â€<br /></p><p><br />People she meets constantly express surprise at whatâ€™s happened â€” surely having a child should have brought her closer to her mother, rather than splitting them asunder? She agrees.<br /></p><p><br />â€œPeople donâ€™t really understand how strong ideology can be,â€ she says. â€œI think sometimes of that group and that feminism as being close to a cult. I feel I had to de-programme myself in order to have independent thought. Itâ€™s been an ongoing struggle. When you have a cult, you have a cult leader who demands a certain conformity . . . And when you have a celebrity who has cultural-icon status, economic power beyond what you can imagine, you canâ€™t resist that person â€” if you want to stay in their realm. Because once you start challenging them, they kick you out.â€ <br /></p></blockquote>That's the trouble with ideological movements, they lose the ability for self-critical reflection on their efficiency in translating ideals into practice, invariably preferring the consistency of the ideals to the messiness of reality.<br />

As bad a parent as Alice Walker was, she doesn't hold a candle to Austrian engineer Josef Fritzl, of course. Don't <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/austria">click through</a> unless you're prepared to be completely revolted; this dude imprisoned his daughter in an underground dungeon for 24 years, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whaddup, bitches?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/08/07/whaddup-bitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if this law passes: The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=b5db8bf97da0d25d&ex=1344139200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">this law passes:</a>

<blockquote>
The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates â€œa paradigm of shame and indignityâ€ for all women.</blockquote>

Somebody should bitch-slap Councilwoman Mealy before she embarrasses her momma again. 

This is a fine example of slippery slopes in action. The Council banned the use of the "n-word", so why shouldn't they ban the "b-word" as nearly as offensive? And then "fatty" because it's nearly as offensive as "bitch", and then "retard", and then "dullard", and then "not exactly a genius". Why not ban all the words in the English language, on the grounds that each one can hurt somebody's feelings if used in the right context?

Then New Yorkers, who used to be the freest people in the world until they started banning smoking in bars and fast food and hard words, will just sit in their many corners banging their heads against their many walls and moaning, almost imperceptibly, about the abject emptiness of their lives.

The bitches.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No good deed goes unpunished</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why Palin's ignorance is &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_palin_interview.php">Palin's ignorance </a> is troubling:

<blockquote>What Sarah Palin revealed is that she has not been interested enough in world affairs to become minimally conversant with the issues. Many people in our great land might have difficulty defining the "Bush Doctrine" exactly. But not to recognize the name, as obviously was the case for Palin, indicates not a failure of last-minute cramming but a lack of attention to any foreign-policy discussion whatsoever in the last seven years.
</blockquote>

Fred Kaplan's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199937/">recap in Slate</a> is excellent:

<blockquote>
The other spine-chilling moment came when Gibson asked about her recent comment, in a speech at her church, that the war in Iraq is "a task that is from God." (ABC then showed a YouTube clip of the speech.) Palin tried to finesse the question, saying that her remarks were only "a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words" that we should pray not that God is on our side but that we are on God's side. Gibson didn't back down, noting that she had in fact gone on to say, "There is a plan, and it is God's plan." To this, Palin replied:

   <em> I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that these are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That in my worldview is a grandâ€”the grand plan.</em>

Two things came to mind upon hearing her say these words. First, they sound like the earnest answer given by a contestant in a beauty pageant when the M.C. asks her about world peace. (Sorry to seem sexist, but it's true; read it again.)

Second, and more to the point, do we want someone a heartbeat away from the presidencyâ€”and a 72-year-old cancer survivor's heartbeat, at thatâ€”to possess both impetuousness ("You can't blink") and holy certitude? Isn't that what we've had, actually in the Oval Office, the past eight years?</blockquote>

Robots are wired to react a certain way, but people are required to think. 

Here's the bonus beauty queen interview for comparison:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

In other news, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6595446.html?rssid=193">Lorne Michaels Wants Fey for SNL's Palin:</a>
<blockquote>Saturday Night Live creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels said the show is talking with Tina Fey about playing Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin at some point this season, possibly as soon as this Saturday's season premiere.</blockquote>

This would be superb, of course.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadband Politics &#187; Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The interviewer&#8217;s name was Charlie</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why Palin's ignorance is &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_palin_interview.php">Palin's ignorance </a> is troubling:

<blockquote>What Sarah Palin revealed is that she has not been interested enough in world affairs to become minimally conversant with the issues. Many people in our great land might have difficulty defining the "Bush Doctrine" exactly. But not to recognize the name, as obviously was the case for Palin, indicates not a failure of last-minute cramming but a lack of attention to any foreign-policy discussion whatsoever in the last seven years.
</blockquote>

Fred Kaplan's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199937/">recap in Slate</a> is excellent:

<blockquote>
The other spine-chilling moment came when Gibson asked about her recent comment, in a speech at her church, that the war in Iraq is "a task that is from God." (ABC then showed a YouTube clip of the speech.) Palin tried to finesse the question, saying that her remarks were only "a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words" that we should pray not that God is on our side but that we are on God's side. Gibson didn't back down, noting that she had in fact gone on to say, "There is a plan, and it is God's plan." To this, Palin replied:

   <em> I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that these are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That in my worldview is a grandâ€”the grand plan.</em>

Two things came to mind upon hearing her say these words. First, they sound like the earnest answer given by a contestant in a beauty pageant when the M.C. asks her about world peace. (Sorry to seem sexist, but it's true; read it again.)

Second, and more to the point, do we want someone a heartbeat away from the presidencyâ€”and a 72-year-old cancer survivor's heartbeat, at thatâ€”to possess both impetuousness ("You can't blink") and holy certitude? Isn't that what we've had, actually in the Oval Office, the past eight years?</blockquote>

Robots are wired to react a certain way, but people are required to think. 

Here's the bonus beauty queen interview for comparison:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

In other news, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6595446.html?rssid=193">Lorne Michaels Wants Fey for SNL's Palin:</a>
<blockquote>Saturday Night Live creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels said the show is talking with Tina Fey about playing Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin at some point this season, possibly as soon as this Saturday's season premiere.</blockquote>

This would be superb, of course.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was McCain thinking?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26457563#26457563" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the big dog. She's not at all embarrassing, not a Katherine Harris, Harriet Miers, or Dan Quayle. All in all, a good contrast to Biden who's tainted with the scent of corruption. 

This just might work for McCain.

UPDATE: But seriously, what was McCain thinking? Palin is a nice woman, but there's no way in hell she should be allowed inside the White House if not on a tour. McCain has effectively conceded the election. Welcome to the Oval Office, President Obama, listen to Sen. Biden carefully and don't screw too many things up.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close to a Cult</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/close-to-a-cult/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Walker, the author of The Color Purple, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. There's an interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London) on the breakdown &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice Walker, the author of <em>The Color Purple</em>, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. <!--more-->There's an <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London)</a> on the breakdown of the relationship that's informative reading if you care for this sort of thing.
<br /></p><blockquote><p>Having been raised to believe that â€œitâ€™s not nature, itâ€™s nurtureâ€, she was not prepared for the strength of her feelings for her baby. â€œI adore him,â€ she says. â€œHeâ€™s really into running and jumping and heâ€™s very attached to me. Itâ€™s all, â€˜Mommy, Mommy, Mommyâ€™, and itâ€™s very difficult to leave him.â€<br /></p><p><br />People she meets constantly express surprise at whatâ€™s happened â€” surely having a child should have brought her closer to her mother, rather than splitting them asunder? She agrees.<br /></p><p><br />â€œPeople donâ€™t really understand how strong ideology can be,â€ she says. â€œI think sometimes of that group and that feminism as being close to a cult. I feel I had to de-programme myself in order to have independent thought. Itâ€™s been an ongoing struggle. When you have a cult, you have a cult leader who demands a certain conformity . . . And when you have a celebrity who has cultural-icon status, economic power beyond what you can imagine, you canâ€™t resist that person â€” if you want to stay in their realm. Because once you start challenging them, they kick you out.â€ <br /></p></blockquote>That's the trouble with ideological movements, they lose the ability for self-critical reflection on their efficiency in translating ideals into practice, invariably preferring the consistency of the ideals to the messiness of reality.<br />

As bad a parent as Alice Walker was, she doesn't hold a candle to Austrian engineer Josef Fritzl, of course. Don't <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/austria">click through</a> unless you're prepared to be completely revolted; this dude imprisoned his daughter in an underground dungeon for 24 years, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whaddup, bitches?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/08/07/whaddup-bitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if this law passes: The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=b5db8bf97da0d25d&ex=1344139200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">this law passes:</a>

<blockquote>
The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates â€œa paradigm of shame and indignityâ€ for all women.</blockquote>

Somebody should bitch-slap Councilwoman Mealy before she embarrasses her momma again. 

This is a fine example of slippery slopes in action. The Council banned the use of the "n-word", so why shouldn't they ban the "b-word" as nearly as offensive? And then "fatty" because it's nearly as offensive as "bitch", and then "retard", and then "dullard", and then "not exactly a genius". Why not ban all the words in the English language, on the grounds that each one can hurt somebody's feelings if used in the right context?

Then New Yorkers, who used to be the freest people in the world until they started banning smoking in bars and fast food and hard words, will just sit in their many corners banging their heads against their many walls and moaning, almost imperceptibly, about the abject emptiness of their lives.

The bitches.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No good deed goes unpunished</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26457563#26457563" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the big dog. She's not at all embarrassing, not a Katherine Harris, Harriet Miers, or Dan Quayle. All in all, a good contrast to Biden who's tainted with the scent of corruption. 

This just might work for McCain.

UPDATE: But seriously, what was McCain thinking? Palin is a nice woman, but there's no way in hell she should be allowed inside the White House if not on a tour. McCain has effectively conceded the election. Welcome to the Oval Office, President Obama, listen to Sen. Biden carefully and don't screw too many things up.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadband Politics &#187; Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The interviewer&#8217;s name was Charlie</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why Palin's ignorance is &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_palin_interview.php">Palin's ignorance </a> is troubling:

<blockquote>What Sarah Palin revealed is that she has not been interested enough in world affairs to become minimally conversant with the issues. Many people in our great land might have difficulty defining the "Bush Doctrine" exactly. But not to recognize the name, as obviously was the case for Palin, indicates not a failure of last-minute cramming but a lack of attention to any foreign-policy discussion whatsoever in the last seven years.
</blockquote>

Fred Kaplan's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199937/">recap in Slate</a> is excellent:

<blockquote>
The other spine-chilling moment came when Gibson asked about her recent comment, in a speech at her church, that the war in Iraq is "a task that is from God." (ABC then showed a YouTube clip of the speech.) Palin tried to finesse the question, saying that her remarks were only "a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words" that we should pray not that God is on our side but that we are on God's side. Gibson didn't back down, noting that she had in fact gone on to say, "There is a plan, and it is God's plan." To this, Palin replied:

   <em> I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that these are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That in my worldview is a grandâ€”the grand plan.</em>

Two things came to mind upon hearing her say these words. First, they sound like the earnest answer given by a contestant in a beauty pageant when the M.C. asks her about world peace. (Sorry to seem sexist, but it's true; read it again.)

Second, and more to the point, do we want someone a heartbeat away from the presidencyâ€”and a 72-year-old cancer survivor's heartbeat, at thatâ€”to possess both impetuousness ("You can't blink") and holy certitude? Isn't that what we've had, actually in the Oval Office, the past eight years?</blockquote>

Robots are wired to react a certain way, but people are required to think. 

Here's the bonus beauty queen interview for comparison:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

In other news, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6595446.html?rssid=193">Lorne Michaels Wants Fey for SNL's Palin:</a>
<blockquote>Saturday Night Live creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels said the show is talking with Tina Fey about playing Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin at some point this season, possibly as soon as this Saturday's season premiere.</blockquote>

This would be superb, of course.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was McCain thinking?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26457563#26457563" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the big dog. She's not at all embarrassing, not a Katherine Harris, Harriet Miers, or Dan Quayle. All in all, a good contrast to Biden who's tainted with the scent of corruption. 

This just might work for McCain.

UPDATE: But seriously, what was McCain thinking? Palin is a nice woman, but there's no way in hell she should be allowed inside the White House if not on a tour. McCain has effectively conceded the election. Welcome to the Oval Office, President Obama, listen to Sen. Biden carefully and don't screw too many things up.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close to a Cult</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/close-to-a-cult/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Walker, the author of The Color Purple, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. There's an interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London) on the breakdown &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice Walker, the author of <em>The Color Purple</em>, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. <!--more-->There's an <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London)</a> on the breakdown of the relationship that's informative reading if you care for this sort of thing.
<br /></p><blockquote><p>Having been raised to believe that â€œitâ€™s not nature, itâ€™s nurtureâ€, she was not prepared for the strength of her feelings for her baby. â€œI adore him,â€ she says. â€œHeâ€™s really into running and jumping and heâ€™s very attached to me. Itâ€™s all, â€˜Mommy, Mommy, Mommyâ€™, and itâ€™s very difficult to leave him.â€<br /></p><p><br />People she meets constantly express surprise at whatâ€™s happened â€” surely having a child should have brought her closer to her mother, rather than splitting them asunder? She agrees.<br /></p><p><br />â€œPeople donâ€™t really understand how strong ideology can be,â€ she says. â€œI think sometimes of that group and that feminism as being close to a cult. I feel I had to de-programme myself in order to have independent thought. Itâ€™s been an ongoing struggle. When you have a cult, you have a cult leader who demands a certain conformity . . . And when you have a celebrity who has cultural-icon status, economic power beyond what you can imagine, you canâ€™t resist that person â€” if you want to stay in their realm. Because once you start challenging them, they kick you out.â€ <br /></p></blockquote>That's the trouble with ideological movements, they lose the ability for self-critical reflection on their efficiency in translating ideals into practice, invariably preferring the consistency of the ideals to the messiness of reality.<br />

As bad a parent as Alice Walker was, she doesn't hold a candle to Austrian engineer Josef Fritzl, of course. Don't <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/austria">click through</a> unless you're prepared to be completely revolted; this dude imprisoned his daughter in an underground dungeon for 24 years, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whaddup, bitches?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/08/07/whaddup-bitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if this law passes: The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=b5db8bf97da0d25d&ex=1344139200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">this law passes:</a>

<blockquote>
The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates â€œa paradigm of shame and indignityâ€ for all women.</blockquote>

Somebody should bitch-slap Councilwoman Mealy before she embarrasses her momma again. 

This is a fine example of slippery slopes in action. The Council banned the use of the "n-word", so why shouldn't they ban the "b-word" as nearly as offensive? And then "fatty" because it's nearly as offensive as "bitch", and then "retard", and then "dullard", and then "not exactly a genius". Why not ban all the words in the English language, on the grounds that each one can hurt somebody's feelings if used in the right context?

Then New Yorkers, who used to be the freest people in the world until they started banning smoking in bars and fast food and hard words, will just sit in their many corners banging their heads against their many walls and moaning, almost imperceptibly, about the abject emptiness of their lives.

The bitches.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No good deed goes unpunished</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/close-to-a-cult/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Walker, the author of The Color Purple, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. There's an interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London) on the breakdown &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice Walker, the author of <em>The Color Purple</em>, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. <!--more-->There's an <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London)</a> on the breakdown of the relationship that's informative reading if you care for this sort of thing.
<br /></p><blockquote><p>Having been raised to believe that â€œitâ€™s not nature, itâ€™s nurtureâ€, she was not prepared for the strength of her feelings for her baby. â€œI adore him,â€ she says. â€œHeâ€™s really into running and jumping and heâ€™s very attached to me. Itâ€™s all, â€˜Mommy, Mommy, Mommyâ€™, and itâ€™s very difficult to leave him.â€<br /></p><p><br />People she meets constantly express surprise at whatâ€™s happened â€” surely having a child should have brought her closer to her mother, rather than splitting them asunder? She agrees.<br /></p><p><br />â€œPeople donâ€™t really understand how strong ideology can be,â€ she says. â€œI think sometimes of that group and that feminism as being close to a cult. I feel I had to de-programme myself in order to have independent thought. Itâ€™s been an ongoing struggle. When you have a cult, you have a cult leader who demands a certain conformity . . . And when you have a celebrity who has cultural-icon status, economic power beyond what you can imagine, you canâ€™t resist that person â€” if you want to stay in their realm. Because once you start challenging them, they kick you out.â€ <br /></p></blockquote>That's the trouble with ideological movements, they lose the ability for self-critical reflection on their efficiency in translating ideals into practice, invariably preferring the consistency of the ideals to the messiness of reality.<br />

As bad a parent as Alice Walker was, she doesn't hold a candle to Austrian engineer Josef Fritzl, of course. Don't <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/austria">click through</a> unless you're prepared to be completely revolted; this dude imprisoned his daughter in an underground dungeon for 24 years, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadband Politics &#187; Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The interviewer&#8217;s name was Charlie</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why Palin's ignorance is &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_palin_interview.php">Palin's ignorance </a> is troubling:

<blockquote>What Sarah Palin revealed is that she has not been interested enough in world affairs to become minimally conversant with the issues. Many people in our great land might have difficulty defining the "Bush Doctrine" exactly. But not to recognize the name, as obviously was the case for Palin, indicates not a failure of last-minute cramming but a lack of attention to any foreign-policy discussion whatsoever in the last seven years.
</blockquote>

Fred Kaplan's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199937/">recap in Slate</a> is excellent:

<blockquote>
The other spine-chilling moment came when Gibson asked about her recent comment, in a speech at her church, that the war in Iraq is "a task that is from God." (ABC then showed a YouTube clip of the speech.) Palin tried to finesse the question, saying that her remarks were only "a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words" that we should pray not that God is on our side but that we are on God's side. Gibson didn't back down, noting that she had in fact gone on to say, "There is a plan, and it is God's plan." To this, Palin replied:

   <em> I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that these are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That in my worldview is a grandâ€”the grand plan.</em>

Two things came to mind upon hearing her say these words. First, they sound like the earnest answer given by a contestant in a beauty pageant when the M.C. asks her about world peace. (Sorry to seem sexist, but it's true; read it again.)

Second, and more to the point, do we want someone a heartbeat away from the presidencyâ€”and a 72-year-old cancer survivor's heartbeat, at thatâ€”to possess both impetuousness ("You can't blink") and holy certitude? Isn't that what we've had, actually in the Oval Office, the past eight years?</blockquote>

Robots are wired to react a certain way, but people are required to think. 

Here's the bonus beauty queen interview for comparison:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

In other news, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6595446.html?rssid=193">Lorne Michaels Wants Fey for SNL's Palin:</a>
<blockquote>Saturday Night Live creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels said the show is talking with Tina Fey about playing Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin at some point this season, possibly as soon as this Saturday's season premiere.</blockquote>

This would be superb, of course.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was McCain thinking?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26457563#26457563" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the big dog. She's not at all embarrassing, not a Katherine Harris, Harriet Miers, or Dan Quayle. All in all, a good contrast to Biden who's tainted with the scent of corruption. 

This just might work for McCain.

UPDATE: But seriously, what was McCain thinking? Palin is a nice woman, but there's no way in hell she should be allowed inside the White House if not on a tour. McCain has effectively conceded the election. Welcome to the Oval Office, President Obama, listen to Sen. Biden carefully and don't screw too many things up.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close to a Cult</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/close-to-a-cult/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Walker, the author of The Color Purple, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. There's an interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London) on the breakdown &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice Walker, the author of <em>The Color Purple</em>, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. <!--more-->There's an <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London)</a> on the breakdown of the relationship that's informative reading if you care for this sort of thing.
<br /></p><blockquote><p>Having been raised to believe that â€œitâ€™s not nature, itâ€™s nurtureâ€, she was not prepared for the strength of her feelings for her baby. â€œI adore him,â€ she says. â€œHeâ€™s really into running and jumping and heâ€™s very attached to me. Itâ€™s all, â€˜Mommy, Mommy, Mommyâ€™, and itâ€™s very difficult to leave him.â€<br /></p><p><br />People she meets constantly express surprise at whatâ€™s happened â€” surely having a child should have brought her closer to her mother, rather than splitting them asunder? She agrees.<br /></p><p><br />â€œPeople donâ€™t really understand how strong ideology can be,â€ she says. â€œI think sometimes of that group and that feminism as being close to a cult. I feel I had to de-programme myself in order to have independent thought. Itâ€™s been an ongoing struggle. When you have a cult, you have a cult leader who demands a certain conformity . . . And when you have a celebrity who has cultural-icon status, economic power beyond what you can imagine, you canâ€™t resist that person â€” if you want to stay in their realm. Because once you start challenging them, they kick you out.â€ <br /></p></blockquote>That's the trouble with ideological movements, they lose the ability for self-critical reflection on their efficiency in translating ideals into practice, invariably preferring the consistency of the ideals to the messiness of reality.<br />

As bad a parent as Alice Walker was, she doesn't hold a candle to Austrian engineer Josef Fritzl, of course. Don't <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/austria">click through</a> unless you're prepared to be completely revolted; this dude imprisoned his daughter in an underground dungeon for 24 years, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whaddup, bitches?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/08/07/whaddup-bitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if this law passes: The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=b5db8bf97da0d25d&ex=1344139200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">this law passes:</a>

<blockquote>
The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates â€œa paradigm of shame and indignityâ€ for all women.</blockquote>

Somebody should bitch-slap Councilwoman Mealy before she embarrasses her momma again. 

This is a fine example of slippery slopes in action. The Council banned the use of the "n-word", so why shouldn't they ban the "b-word" as nearly as offensive? And then "fatty" because it's nearly as offensive as "bitch", and then "retard", and then "dullard", and then "not exactly a genius". Why not ban all the words in the English language, on the grounds that each one can hurt somebody's feelings if used in the right context?

Then New Yorkers, who used to be the freest people in the world until they started banning smoking in bars and fast food and hard words, will just sit in their many corners banging their heads against their many walls and moaning, almost imperceptibly, about the abject emptiness of their lives.

The bitches.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No good deed goes unpunished</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/08/07/whaddup-bitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if this law passes: The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=b5db8bf97da0d25d&ex=1344139200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">this law passes:</a>

<blockquote>
The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates â€œa paradigm of shame and indignityâ€ for all women.</blockquote>

Somebody should bitch-slap Councilwoman Mealy before she embarrasses her momma again. 

This is a fine example of slippery slopes in action. The Council banned the use of the "n-word", so why shouldn't they ban the "b-word" as nearly as offensive? And then "fatty" because it's nearly as offensive as "bitch", and then "retard", and then "dullard", and then "not exactly a genius". Why not ban all the words in the English language, on the grounds that each one can hurt somebody's feelings if used in the right context?

Then New Yorkers, who used to be the freest people in the world until they started banning smoking in bars and fast food and hard words, will just sit in their many corners banging their heads against their many walls and moaning, almost imperceptibly, about the abject emptiness of their lives.

The bitches.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broadband Politics &#187; Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:10:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The interviewer&#8217;s name was Charlie</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 09:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why Palin's ignorance is &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sarah Palin scored points for knowing her interviewer's nickname, but didn't do so well on the actual questions. Most notably, she went all "moose in the headlights" when asked about the Bush Doctrine. Jim Fallows explains why <a href="http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/the_palin_interview.php">Palin's ignorance </a> is troubling:

<blockquote>What Sarah Palin revealed is that she has not been interested enough in world affairs to become minimally conversant with the issues. Many people in our great land might have difficulty defining the "Bush Doctrine" exactly. But not to recognize the name, as obviously was the case for Palin, indicates not a failure of last-minute cramming but a lack of attention to any foreign-policy discussion whatsoever in the last seven years.
</blockquote>

Fred Kaplan's <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2199937/">recap in Slate</a> is excellent:

<blockquote>
The other spine-chilling moment came when Gibson asked about her recent comment, in a speech at her church, that the war in Iraq is "a task that is from God." (ABC then showed a YouTube clip of the speech.) Palin tried to finesse the question, saying that her remarks were only "a repeat of Abraham Lincoln's words" that we should pray not that God is on our side but that we are on God's side. Gibson didn't back down, noting that she had in fact gone on to say, "There is a plan, and it is God's plan." To this, Palin replied:

   <em> I believe that there is a plan for this world and that plan for this world is for good. I believe that there is great hope and great potential for every country to be able to live and be protected with inalienable rights that I believe are God-given, Charlie, and I believe that these are the rights to life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That in my worldview is a grandâ€”the grand plan.</em>

Two things came to mind upon hearing her say these words. First, they sound like the earnest answer given by a contestant in a beauty pageant when the M.C. asks her about world peace. (Sorry to seem sexist, but it's true; read it again.)

Second, and more to the point, do we want someone a heartbeat away from the presidencyâ€”and a 72-year-old cancer survivor's heartbeat, at thatâ€”to possess both impetuousness ("You can't blink") and holy certitude? Isn't that what we've had, actually in the Oval Office, the past eight years?</blockquote>

Robots are wired to react a certain way, but people are required to think. 

Here's the bonus beauty queen interview for comparison:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lj3iNxZ8Dww&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

In other news, <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6595446.html?rssid=193">Lorne Michaels Wants Fey for SNL's Palin:</a>
<blockquote>Saturday Night Live creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels said the show is talking with Tina Fey about playing Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin at some point this season, possibly as soon as this Saturday's season premiere.</blockquote>

This would be superb, of course.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/09/the-interviewers-name-was-charlie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What was McCain thinking?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/?p=4855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/26457563#26457563" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Hmmm. (Skip the first 8 minutes, it's just the old man rambling.) She's young, good-looking, inexperienced, a bit ideological, and a member of a marginal group; just like Barack Obama, actually. But she's running for VP, not to be the big dog. She's not at all embarrassing, not a Katherine Harris, Harriet Miers, or Dan Quayle. All in all, a good contrast to Biden who's tainted with the scent of corruption. 

This just might work for McCain.

UPDATE: But seriously, what was McCain thinking? Palin is a nice woman, but there's no way in hell she should be allowed inside the White House if not on a tour. McCain has effectively conceded the election. Welcome to the Oval Office, President Obama, listen to Sen. Biden carefully and don't screw too many things up.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/08/monty-python-vp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Close to a Cult</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Age crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2008/05/05/close-to-a-cult/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alice Walker, the author of The Color Purple, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. There's an interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London) on the breakdown &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alice Walker, the author of <em>The Color Purple</em>, is admired and revered by all sorts of left-wing progressive people. Unfortunately, her daughter Rebecca isn't one of them. <!--more-->There's an <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article3866798.ece">interesting article in the Sunday Times (of London)</a> on the breakdown of the relationship that's informative reading if you care for this sort of thing.
<br /></p><blockquote><p>Having been raised to believe that â€œitâ€™s not nature, itâ€™s nurtureâ€, she was not prepared for the strength of her feelings for her baby. â€œI adore him,â€ she says. â€œHeâ€™s really into running and jumping and heâ€™s very attached to me. Itâ€™s all, â€˜Mommy, Mommy, Mommyâ€™, and itâ€™s very difficult to leave him.â€<br /></p><p><br />People she meets constantly express surprise at whatâ€™s happened â€” surely having a child should have brought her closer to her mother, rather than splitting them asunder? She agrees.<br /></p><p><br />â€œPeople donâ€™t really understand how strong ideology can be,â€ she says. â€œI think sometimes of that group and that feminism as being close to a cult. I feel I had to de-programme myself in order to have independent thought. Itâ€™s been an ongoing struggle. When you have a cult, you have a cult leader who demands a certain conformity . . . And when you have a celebrity who has cultural-icon status, economic power beyond what you can imagine, you canâ€™t resist that person â€” if you want to stay in their realm. Because once you start challenging them, they kick you out.â€ <br /></p></blockquote>That's the trouble with ideological movements, they lose the ability for self-critical reflection on their efficiency in translating ideals into practice, invariably preferring the consistency of the ideals to the messiness of reality.<br />

As bad a parent as Alice Walker was, she doesn't hold a candle to Austrian engineer Josef Fritzl, of course. Don't <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/austria">click through</a> unless you're prepared to be completely revolted; this dude imprisoned his daughter in an underground dungeon for 24 years, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2008/05/close-to-a-cult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whaddup, bitches?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/08/07/whaddup-bitches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if this law passes: The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't be able to say that in New York if <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/07/nyregion/07bword.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5088&en=b5db8bf97da0d25d&ex=1344139200&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss">this law passes:</a>

<blockquote>
The New York City Council, which drew national headlines when it passed a symbolic citywide ban earlier this year on the use of the so-called n-word, has turned its linguistic (and legislative) lance toward a different slur: bitch.

The term is hateful and deeply sexist, said Councilwoman Darlene Mealy of Brooklyn, who has introduced a measure against the word, saying it creates â€œa paradigm of shame and indignityâ€ for all women.</blockquote>

Somebody should bitch-slap Councilwoman Mealy before she embarrasses her momma again. 

This is a fine example of slippery slopes in action. The Council banned the use of the "n-word", so why shouldn't they ban the "b-word" as nearly as offensive? And then "fatty" because it's nearly as offensive as "bitch", and then "retard", and then "dullard", and then "not exactly a genius". Why not ban all the words in the English language, on the grounds that each one can hurt somebody's feelings if used in the right context?

Then New Yorkers, who used to be the freest people in the world until they started banning smoking in bars and fast food and hard words, will just sit in their many corners banging their heads against their many walls and moaning, almost imperceptibly, about the abject emptiness of their lives.

The bitches.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/08/whaddup-bitches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No good deed goes unpunished</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/03/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/03/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 03:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/index.php/archives/2007/03/05/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ayann Hirsi Ali is a hero to many who want to see the war on Islamic terrorism end in a victory for the West. But every hero has her critics, and Ali is no exception. For some of the most &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/03/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ayann Hirsi Ali is a hero to many who want to see the war on Islamic terrorism end in a victory for the West. But every hero has her critics, and Ali is no exception. For some of the most mind-bending perverse logic you've ever seen, check the Newsweek article <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17204802/site/newsweek/">attacking Ali from the pro-Muslim and pro-feminist (!) point of view:</a>

<blockquote>
Other Muslim women interested in reform aren't exactly in step with Hirsi Ali. "I wish people had been nicer to her," says Muslim author and feminist Asra Nomani. "But I don't blame Islam. I blame really messed-up people who've used religion to justify their misogyny." As staunchly patriarchal strains of Wahhabi Islam infiltrate Muslim cultures outside the gulf region, many modern female followers are wondering how to embrace their religion without succumbing to its more sexist demands. And they're coming up with answers that don't require them to abandon either their religion or their culture. In the Middle East and South Asia, a strong majority of Muslim women recently polled by Gallup believed they should have the right to work outside the home and serve in the highest levels of government. Here in the United States, dozens of scholars like Ithaca College's Asma Barlas, Harvard's Leila Ahmed and Notre Dame's Asma Afsaruddin have challenged widely accepted interpretations of the Qur'an. "They are Islam's Martina Luthers," jokes Nomani. "They are my heroes."</blockquote>

It's not clear what "being nicer" would have meant: no clitorectomy, fewer beatings, and a better arranged marriage, or not being disowned? Some people are just so hard to please.

Linklove  to <a href="http://www.rogerlsimon.com/">Roger L, Simon</a>.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2007/03/no-good-deed-goes-unpunished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

