<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Broadband Politics &#187; Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/category/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does Free Press Coordinate Strategy with Google?</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/07/does-free-press-coordinate-strategy-with-google/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/07/does-free-press-coordinate-strategy-with-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 22:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/07/does-free-press-coordinate-strategy-with-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ethics complaints against former Google lobbyist Andrew McLaughlin aren&#8217;t going away. Over a two-week period in February 2010, McLaughlin exchanged numerous emails with Free Press director Ben Scott, another prominent advocate for Net neutrality who has coordinated policy strategy &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/07/does-free-press-coordinate-strategy-with-google/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ethics complaints against former Google lobbyist Andrew McLaughlin <a href="http://nlpc.org/cached/white-house-emails-show-more-extensive-improper-contact-google.html?q=stories/2010/07/22/white-house-emails-show-more-extensive-improper-contact-google">aren&#8217;t going away.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Over a two-week period in February 2010, McLaughlin exchanged numerous emails with Free Press director Ben Scott, another prominent advocate for Net neutrality who has coordinated policy strategy with Google and attended joint meetings with Google at the FCC and White House on numerous occasions.  They agreed to meet outside the White House at a nearby coffee shop to discuss Internet policy.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to see this level of coordination, given all of Free Press&#8217; claims of independence. But it&#8217;s not unusual for members of a coalition to talk to each other; they&#8217;re often directed to do so by the government. In a former life, I was often in that position, so this still has a &#8220;gambling in Casablanca&#8221; feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/07/does-free-press-coordinate-strategy-with-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pure Politics</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/01/pure-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/01/pure-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/01/pure-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, this has nothing much to do with broadband, but it&#8217;s certainly politics. CNN has called the Massachusetts Senate race for Scott Brown. Curt Schilling hasn&#8217;t made any comment on the outcome yet. politics, Massachusetts Senate Race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, this has nothing much to do with broadband, but it&#8217;s certainly politics. <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/category/mass-senate/?hpt=T1">CNN</a> has called the Massachusetts Senate race for Scott Brown. <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/19/jon-stewart-on-the-massachusetts-senate-election/">Curt Schilling</a> hasn&#8217;t made any comment on the outcome yet.</p>
<p class="technorati-tags"><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/politics" rel="tag">politics</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Massachusetts%20Senate%20Race" rel="tag">Massachusetts Senate Race</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2010/01/pure-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality Regulations Coming</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/09/net-neutrality-regulations-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/09/net-neutrality-regulations-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/09/net-neutrality-regulations-coming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In FCC Chairman Genachowski’s long-anticipated statement on net neutrality rulemaking today, the Chairman made the claim that the Internet architecture is both unbiased and future-proof. However, as ITIF notes in a forthcoming report,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In FCC Chairman Genachowski’s <a href="http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html">long-anticipated statement on net neutrality rulemaking</a> today, the Chairman  made the claim that the Internet architecture is both unbiased and future-proof. However, as ITIF notes in a forthcoming report, <a href=http://www.itif.org/index.php?id=281">&#8220;Designed for Change: End-to-End Arguments, Internet Innovation, and the Net Neutrality Debate&#8221;</a>, the Internet&#8217;s architecture doesn&#8217;t make it future-proof, the process of experimentation and continual improvement does; rule making can seriously jeopardize Internet flexibility unless it&#8217;s undertaken with great care. In addition, it’s important to note that  the Internet has always preferred some applications over others; it favors content over communication, for example. Network management is necessary as a means to overcome the Internet’s structural bias, so strict rules limiting network management to the mitigation of spam, malware, and attacks are not good enough. Carriers must be empowered to enable communications applications to compete equitably with content applications; only the carriers can provide fair access to diverse applications and users.</p>
<p>The approach to Internet regulation that focuses exclusively on the rights of consumers and the responsibilities of carriers belies the fact that the Internet invests substantial network control at the intelligent edge; the Internet  gives each of us  the power to be a producer as well as  a  consumer, and with that power comes responsibility. We can innovate without permission, but we all have to behave responsibly.  It goes without saying that open access networks are desirable, so the real test of the FCC’s rulemaking will come from its assessment of both user behavior and operator management practices. We have every confidence that the Commission will undertake a serious, rigorous and fact-based rule making.  The Internet enables innovation to the extent that carriers provide robust and reliable transport services to applications; if this capability is preserved and enhanced by a sensible network management framework, innovation will win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/09/net-neutrality-regulations-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Governor&#8217;s Race</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/california-governors-race-2/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/california-governors-race-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/2009/06/california-governors-race-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re a year away from the primaries in the California governor&#8217;s race, and already candidates are dropping out: Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa announced on national television today that he would not be running for California governor in 2010 after &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/california-governors-race-2/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re a year away from the primaries in the California governor&#8217;s race, and already <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/06/villaraigosa-bows-out-of-california-governors-race.html">candidates are dropping out:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa announced on national television today that he would not be running for California governor in 2010 after flirting with a bid for higher office for months. </p></blockquote>
<p>While Antonio cited time with the family and the pressures that LA is facing, he didn&#8217;t have a serious chance to win anyhow, given his lackluster style, his personal problems, and his overall inability to stand up to former <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governor_Moonbeam#Political_criticism_of_Brown">Gov. Moonbeam</a> in a debate. So farewall, Antonio, we&#8217;ll miss you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see the race come down to <a href="http://jerrybrown.org/">Brown </a>vs. <a href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/tcampbell?ref=nf">Tom</a> <a href="http://www.campbell.org/">Campbell</a>. I&#8217;m a long-time fan of both of them, and would like to see a substantive campaign between two genuine wonks just once in my life.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a hard road for Campbell because he&#8217;s up against two rich dabblers, Meg Whitman and Steve Poizner, who can finance their campaigns with pocket change. If they&#8217;re patriots, they&#8217;ll follow Antonio&#8217;s lead and drop out for the sake of the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/california-governors-race-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iranian Protests</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/iranian-protests/</link>
		<comments>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/iranian-protests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bennett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bennett.com/blog/2009/06/iranian-protests/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan is the one-man, citizen journalism aggregator of the protests in Iran today. His collection of Tweets and YouTube videos convey the impression of a large-scale uprising that the government is trying to control with riot police, chemical weapons, &#8230; <a href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/iranian-protests/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/">Andrew Sullivan</a> is the one-man, citizen journalism aggregator of the protests in Iran today. His collection of Tweets and YouTube videos convey the impression of a large-scale uprising that the government is trying to control with riot police, chemical weapons, and propaganda. It certainly appears that the uprising is gathering steam and that the government is out-matched. Given that the Supreme Leader relies on his moral authority to govern, and that authority is now shot full of holes, it seems unlikely that he can hang on to power.</p>
<p>Twitter and YouTube are certainly playing a role in getting the news out of the blackout the Iranian government has sought to impose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2009/06/iranian-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1328405922.809 seconds -->

