<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Decentralizing the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://broadbandpolitics.com/2002/05/decentralizing-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2002/05/decentralizing-the-web/</link>
	<description>On the theory and practice of networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 08:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://broadbandpolitics.com/2002/05/decentralizing-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2002 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mossback.org/archives/2002/05/decentralizing-the-web/#comment-636</guid>
		<description>I think you may be right -- if you include what I&#039;d call &#039;info &amp; links&#039;  sites. Those may not be as often updated as blogs, but they offer reasonably timely information (or sometimes timeless info -- like curry recipes), and links to useful related  information. 

I think blogs have contributed some and (oddly enough) I also think the whole &#039;dot.com&#039; crash contributed also. Most of those &#039;dot.com&#039; companies tried to keep people on-site. Their demise sent people looking for sites that offered similar content, and those were sites that didn&#039;t hesitate to link to others.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you may be right &#8212; if you include what I&#8217;d call &#8216;info &#038; links&#8217;  sites. Those may not be as often updated as blogs, but they offer reasonably timely information (or sometimes timeless info &#8212; like curry recipes), and links to useful related  information. </p>
<p>I think blogs have contributed some and (oddly enough) I also think the whole &#8216;dot.com&#8217; crash contributed also. Most of those &#8216;dot.com&#8217; companies tried to keep people on-site. Their demise sent people looking for sites that offered similar content, and those were sites that didn&#8217;t hesitate to link to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

